![not funny didn not funny didn](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1200542125689069574/5iBCKFnn_400x400.jpg)
WHO? What credible source other than a message board user named "DJKBsux" has said this? "The way Donkey Kong is portrayed, with includes a lot of his expression, both in-game and in artwork, is considered ridiculous by some." What does that even mean? He didn't punch people in DK64? He had a GUN in the previous game! This opinion has no foundation BUT somebody else's preconceived notions about what they think goes on behind the scenes at Donkey Kong development. I would love to know where this "Donkey Kong beachcomber" schtick comes in. "which many felt went against the beach-combing pacisfist characterization of Donkey Kong that had been in effect since 1994."Īnd what in the sam hill is this line? Citation needed here, please. Yet DKJB's storyline is maligned for being as pointless as the others. WHO has a problem with this game? "Some?" "Many?" "People?" WHO? The only thing factual in that entire section is that the producers didn't want to bog the game down with a pointless storyline, much like Rare didn't in their "Get your bananas back," "Get DK back," "Get DK and Diddy back" storylines.
#NOT FUNNY DIDN'T LAUGH DONKEY KONG FULL#
You response and this whole "criticism" section is so full of weasel words it is sickening. According to the article, there are 36 stages, which is only 4 more than DKC, which can still make DKC longer depending on the difficulty and how long it takes to complete, also, the DKC sequels have 39 and 40 stages (46 even in the DKC3 GBA port), so saying DKJB has more stages is only valid in one case against two. The critisism section is there to include Rare fans' opinions, and however laughable you find them, you can't ignore them, because Wikipedia articles aren't based around the opinions of a single person. Concerned Wikipedia User What you think of the game does not counter the fact that people have these problems with the game, and their arguments are just as valid as yours (even moreso in my opinion). this "Criticism" section is not really a criticism section, but rather a forum for bitter Rare fans who had a problem with Nintendo having the absolute GALL to use their own intellectual property again without their permission. Furthermore, one cannot call DJKB "short" when it actually has more levels and bosses than DKC. Click Here - Covenant Elite 02:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC) How come all we are seeing is the problems Rare fans had with the game instead of what anybody liked about it? The very idea that DKC's storyline is something better than DKJB when it replaces "Get all your Bananas back" with "become the King of Kings." is laughable, period. Thaddius 21:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC) There was some critisicm about the game's length in GameSpot's review (as well as a few others). Instead of typing all the things that you didn't like about the game into a paragraph, it might be a little more productiveto find some reviews to support your points. It's nothing but a type of skilltester thing, not even an actual game, let alone a rereleased Jungle Beat. Jungle Fever has nothing to do with Jungle Beat. RobbieG 12:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC) Jungle Fever I've now moved them to the list of non-Kremling Donkey Kong enemies, which I think is a more appropriate place for them. Besides, Ninjapes are cool, and they did prove reasonably popular with fans - at least, more so than that chicken thing or those spiky ice monsters. It's pretty clumsy looking actually, but at least the redirect won't confuse people anymore. I've given Ninjapes a whole section to themselves, which they don't deserve.
![not funny didn not funny didn](https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.1869543831.0331/ssrco,classic_tee,womens,dd2121:8219e99865,front_alt,square_product,600x600.jpg)
Supposing someone is looking for Ninjape on here, they'll be redirected here and be none the wiser! 12:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC) Why does Ninjape redirect here? This article isn't about Ninjapes! Nothing is gained by including pointless redirects. There's just no need, and the page would be very long anyway.